Astana Withdraws, Vino Suspended
By Phil Liggett
July 24, 2007Alexandre Vinokourov’s positive blood test announced Tuesday has stunned everyone from riders to organizers. Since his crash, he has been portrayed as a limping hero of what, so far, has been a marvellous Tour. Now, he seems to have been caught introducing homologous blood into his system just before the time trial he won in demonstrative fashion.
His Astana team has withdrawn at the invitation of the organizers and Vinokourov was suspended by Astana pending the confirmation of his positive test in his B analysis. It is very unusual for the second test not to confirm the first. In short, Vinokourov, one of the most respected riders in the peloton, will now leave the sport in disgrace.
British rider David Millar, himself a reformed drug taker, has been leading the campaign to clean up the sport. His comment during his own Saunier Duval team’s press conference in Pau, sums up the feelings of most: “I just feel like crying right now.”
Paul, Bob and I are, for once, speechless. We are all very upset with such a stupid action at a time the sport looked to be putting its own house in order. It is incomprehensible that Vinokourov could do such a thing when he must have known he was under suspicion because of his dealing with disgraced doctor Michele Ferrari in Italy. He must have known he would be tested at every opportunity and the time trial was the perfect occasion.
Tomorrow we will know more.
Uncategorized
How hard is the Tour de France?
They say it is one of the hardest athletic events out there. Three weeks of torturing your body everyday, just to get up and do it again the next day. Just imagine if you were injured. Unfortunately that’s just what has happened to the favorite, Alexandre Vinokourov. He crashed in the first week and struggled through the alps. Then yesterday he came back with an amazing time trial and jumped up 14 places. Everyone thought he was back. Today, he looked like he was still in a lot of pain and lost 29 minutes to the leader of the tour. Will he continue??
Check out this article from NYTimes about the tour.
Joost : TV anywhere, anytime…
Joost beta is finally open to everyone now. So, I thought I’d check it out.
Joost a highly disruptive site is a creation of Niklas Zennstrom and Janus Friis who were also behind Kazaa and Skype. To use it you download the player, create a user name and password, log in and you’re ready to go. Old media companies are looking at making deals with Joost to distribute their shows, some say they are using it as an answer to YouTube. Companies like Reuters, Warner Brothers, BET, Comedy Central, MTV and more have made programs available. I expect as popularity increases so will the number of companies and programs we’ll find on Joost.
I’m viewing with a 19″ flat screen monitor on a cable connection, and so far the quality is very good. When there is a lot of motion you do get a bit of fuzziness, but nothing that is unbearable. There are advertisements but they are very short less then 30 seconds at a time. Every so often a small image will appear on top of the picture in the lower right hand corner advertising products. Nothing more than what you would see when watching a soccer match.
Along with watching TV shows and movies, you can chat with viewers and rate shows. Over all I would say it’s pretty impressive. They actually have a couple of episodes from Max Headroom.
Check out this demonstration from the site What’s Joost?
Microsoft, Apple and other companies are still trying to bring the PC and internet to the living room. Joost may give them more incentive. Could this be the future of TV?
Healthcare and Taxes
Every once and a while I post something that is.. well political. Last Friday, I had a very brief discussion with a friend about taxes. One of my comments was that we are one if not the lowest taxed industrialized countries. I also, said I think we are under taxed. Well, I was reminded of this today when I read a statement from Michael Moore (see quote below). Of course about now many of you are probably branding me as a bleeding heart liberal intent on big government blah, blah… Just for saying that I think we are under taxed, and I must be a liberal if I mention Michael Moore. I will only caution that we should all drop the silly categorizations (Liberal, Conservative, etc..) and actually think about things. If we can get past the laziness of these labels, maybe, just maybe some things will actually change for the better.
With that said let me clarify. Our government spends billions upon billions on a war that was never officially declared war. (For it to be an official war, congress must declare war. The president has a constitutional right to move troops but not to declare war.) Congress never declared war on Iraq. Here’s an article to support that. Who Can Declare War? Backgrounder and Research Guide and Section 8: Powers of Congress But, that is another topic. Even as the US goes further and further in debt, taxes are cut and the administration claims it is trimming the budget. Now, none of the trimming is coming off of the “War in Iraq”. It’s coming from things like after school programs, literacy programs, they tried with social security as well as health care. Now, it would seem very obvious to me, what is more important use of US tax dollars: A widely discredited “war”, or programs that directly help the American people? In the end though, the USA general public is broadly mislead to believe that a tax cut is really going to help them and help put more money in their pockets. And still we continue to have alarming numbers of bankruptcies in the US. One of the major causes of bankruptcy is medical bills. This brings me to the Moore quote. I leave the rest to him:
“THAT’S the only thing we should be talking about. How profit and greed are killing our fellow Americans. How profit and private insurance have to be removed from our health care system. CNN should join me in asking why our 9/11 rescue workers aren’t receiving medical care. Somebody should send a crew to Canada to find out why they live longer than we do, and why no Canadian has ever gone bankrupt because of medical bills. And all of the media should start saying how much it costs to go to a doctor in these other top industrialized countries: Nothing. Zip. It’s FREE. Don’t patronize Americans by saying, “Well, it’s not free — they pay for it with taxes!” Yes, we know that. Just like we know that we drive down a city street for FREE — even though we paid for that street with our taxes. The street is FREE, the book at the library is FREE, if your house catches on fire, the fire department will come and put it out for FREE, and if someone snatches your purse, the police officer will chase down the culprit and bring your purse back to you — AND HE WON’T CHARGE YOU A DIME FROM THAT PURSE!
These are all free services, collectively socialized and paid for with our tax dollars. To argue that health care — a life and death issue for many — should not be considered in the same league is ludicrous and archaic. And trust me, once you add up what you pay for out-of-pocket in premiums, deductibles, co-pays, overpriced medicines, and treatments that aren’t covered (not to mention all the other things we pay for like college education, day care and other services that many countries provide for at little or no cost), we, as Americans, are paying far more than the Canadians or Brits or French are paying in taxes. We just don’t call these things taxes, but that’s exactly what they are.”
Driving restrictions in MD
I was just doing some work for Google and came across a site about Maryland Driving Laws. I found this “Passenger Restriction” below interesting:
Passenger Restriction
- Effective October 1, 2005, provisional drivers under the age of 18 are not permitted to carry passengers under the age of 18, except for family members, for the first five (5) months of licensure.
- Violations may result in a suspension of driving privileges.
That just seems odd to me. Is this because they think people under 18 aren’t mature enough to decide for themselves whether or not they should get in a car with a new driver. Did someone’s parents get sued for an accident their kid had? Maybe it’s just me, but it just seems odd. I guess it goes along with their slogan on the signs when you enter MD “Drive Gently” I’m not quite sure how you do that. 😉